The 20 Questions That DoView Boards Answer

See DoView Boards for a high-level introduction and DoView Boards How-To for screenshots of how to use them. This page for details of how you use a DoView Board to answer the key questions about any initiative

Quick Overview

DoView Boards are the faster, innovative way of doing (and proving you are doing) all aspects of outcomes-based planning, implementation, measurement and reporting. They can be used with organizations, strategies, policies, projects, joint ventures, collaborations, sectors and initiatives of any sort in any setting. They can be used for human organizations, human-AI collaborations and potentially for AI agents so they can report back to humans on what they are doing. This page provides details on how you can use DoView Boards.

There are 20 key questions that need to be answered for comprehensive planning, implementation, improvement and reporting on any initiative of any type, and DoView Boards are the lightweight way of answering all of these.

Note that the current implementation of DoView Boards created with the prompts available on this site is a prototype. Use it to pilot and test if the approach adds value, but at the moment, maintain your other planning and implementation documentation as a backup.

Below are the 20 questions that DoView Boards allow you to quickly answer about any initiative you are running or you want to have oversight of.

Challenge: Find any other lightweight app (no app install, runs in a browser window) that answers these 20 questions about any initiative in one place.

Below is a comprehensive DoView Board Walkthrough, which covers the features of DoView Boards. You can access this at any time by clicking on Walkthrough in the top menu of any DoView Board.

The 20 Key Questions

SEE

1. What outcomes, for whom?
What outcomes are being sought, for whom, and what opportunities are there for input to ensure alignment with mandates, obligations and stakeholder intent?

2. How will change happen?
What steps are expected to lead to those outcomes, and is the intervention logic (theory of change) robust?

3. What evidence supports claims regarding change?
What evidence and best practice information supports the proposed approach, and where is evidence from the past weak or uncertain?

4. What could affect success?
What assumptions, risks, dependencies, constraints, and system factors affect success?

PLAN

5. What options and trade-offs were considered?
Why were particular options and trade-offs chosen, and what will not be done as a result?

6. Which priorities matter most next?
Which outcomes and steps are the priorities that will be focused on in the next planning period?

7. What specific action will be taken?
Which projects, services, or activities are going to be undertaken?

8. Is the action aligned with priority outcomes?
How can we know that each project or activity is tightly aligned to priority outcomes?

9. What capabilities, etc., are needed?
What people, systems, relationships, data, and competencies are required?

10. How will budget/funding be used?
How will budget and funding be allocated, and why is this the best use of these?

11. Who can make what decisions?

Who can approve changing, stopping, escalating, or reprioritizing the work, and what are the criteria for such changes?

12. Who is accountable/contracted for doing what?
Who is responsible for what delegated or contracted accountabilities, including staff, contractors, partners, and agencies?

13. What is the performance measurement/evaluation plan?
What is the plan for collecting, analyzing and disseminating performance management and evaluation information?

DO

14. How are parties coordinating?
How are the different parties coordinating, sharing information, and resolving conflicts?

15. How is progress on measures being shown (e.g. indicators, KPIs, OKRs)?
How is information on metrics, indicators, milestones, targets etc. being shown to measure progress?

16. How are answers to evaluation questions being shown?

What evaluation questions are being answered, and how are implementation and impact evaluation results being shown?

17. How is delivery being improved?
How is ongoing implementation of the work being improved as it progresses?

18. How are results being reported?
How is what is being done, its impact and results being comprehensively reported back to relevant parties?

19. How is knowledge management being handled?
How is knowledge and information about the initiative being handed on to others if staff or those delivering the work change?

20. How is the work being sustained?
How is the work being sustained, scaled, embedded, handed over to others, or ultimately exited?

1. What outcomes, for whom?
What outcomes are being sought, for whom, and what opportunities are there for input to ensure alignment with mandates, obligations and stakeholder intent?

  • What outcomes are being sought, for whom, and what opportunities are there for input to ensure alignment with mandates, obligations and stakeholder intent?

    • Draw This-Then pages for the outcomes being sought and the steps believed to lead to them. Do this by hand, or paste the free AI prompt into ChatGPT or Claude and tell it what the board is about.

    • Amend and agree with decision-makers or stakeholders the draft pages so they truly represent what is being attempted.

    • Use the board for every discussion about outcomes, with governance, management, staff, contractors, providers, funders and stakeholders.

    • If you also have to show alignment with another party's outcomes, put their outcomes on their additional This-Then pages and link your projects and activities up to them. You can copy pages in from another board.

    The This-Then pages become the single shared picture of what is being attempted. Every later discussion starts from them.

    Walkthrough where this is illustrated

The video below will start at the relevant section.

2. How will change happen?
What steps are expected to lead to those outcomes, and is the intervention logic (theory of change) robust?

  • What steps are expected to lead to those outcomes, and is the intervention logic (theory of change) robust?

    • Add links between This-Then boxes to show which steps are believed to make other steps and outcomes happen.

    • Read these links as your intervention logic, the way you expect to reach higher-level outcomes. AI can draft a first set of links for you to amend and agree.

    • Have the logic checked. An independent expert, or an independent AI, can look at whether the links seem credible.

    Many approaches claim a clear theory of change. Few show the logic of every step in one fine-grained visual model the way a DoView Board does.

    Walkthrough where this is illustrated

The video below will start at the relevant section.

3. What evidence supports claims regarding change?
What evidence and best practice information supports the proposed approach, and where is evidence from the past weak or uncertain?

  • What evidence and best practice information supports the proposed approach, and where is evidence from the past weak or uncertain?

    • Click the border of a This-Then box, then click the small arrow on a link, and put the evidence or a sound rationale behind that link.

    • Use this to show, to a funder or anyone else, that the connections in your model are evidence-based.

    • AI can populate draft evidence under your links. You, an expert, or an independent AI can then check it.

    The evidence sits behind the model, so the board stays simple on the surface while the support for each link is one click away.

    Walkthrough where this is illustrated

The video below will start at the relevant section.

4. What could affect success?
What assumptions, risks, dependencies, constraints, and system factors may affect success?

  • What assumptions, risks, dependencies, constraints, and system factors affect success?

    • Put important risks and constraints on the This-Then pages as boxes, written as the result you want, the positive.

    • Put assumptions in as boxes too. Dependencies show up in the links between boxes.

    • Where one result works against another, use a negative link. Negative links show as red arrows.

    Everything about the strategy space sits in one place. Risks and assumptions are not hidden in a separate table where decision-makers can miss them.

    Walkthrough where this is illustrated

The video below will start at the relevant section.

5. What options and trade-offs were considered?
Why were particular options and trade-offs chosen, and what will not be done as a result?

The video below will start at the relevant section.

6. Which priorities matter most next?
Which outcomes and steps are the priorities that will be focused on in the next planning period?

The video below will start at the relevant section.

7. What specific action will be taken?
What projects, services, or activities are going to be undertaken?

  • Which projects, services, or activities are going to be undertaken?

    • Add a How page with a box for each project, service or activity that will make the This-Then boxes happen.

    • Add more How pages beneath it for the next levels down, such as teams and then individuals or AI agents, linked with vertical links.

    • Put hyperlinks under a project box out to its page in any project tool you already use. So you do not do any rework.

    For a large organization, initiative or sector the DoView Board holds the high-level outcomes logic and sits above your detailed project platform and tools, which hold the task detail, and you can drill down from a link in your DoView Board.

    Walkthrough where this is illustrated

The video below will open at the right section.

8. Is the action aligned with priority outcomes?
How can we know that each project or activity is tightly aligned to priority outcomes?

The video below will start at the relevant section.

9. What capabilities etc., are needed?
What people, systems, relationships, data, and competencies are required?

The video below will start at the relevant section.

10. How will budget/funding be used?
How will budget and funding be allocated, and why is this the best use of these?

  • How will budget and funding be allocated, and why is this the best use of these?

    • Record how much budget sits behind each How box, such as a project, in its details.

    • Use the vertical alignment from projects to This-Then boxes, as in question 8, to show, as far as possible, the steps and outcomes the money is aimed at.

    • Use this in any discussion to show where funding is going in outcome terms.

    Because one project can affect several outcomes, exact apportioning is often not possible. The board still shows what the spend is buying far more clearly than just a list of budget lines.

    Walkthrough where this is illustrated

The video below will open at the relevant section.

11. Who can make what decisions?
Who can approve changing, stopping, escalating, or reprioritizing the work, and what are the criteria for such changes?

The video below will start at the relevant section.

12. Who is accountable/contracted for doing what?
Who is responsible for what delegated or contracted accountabilities, including staff, contractors, partners, and agencies?

The video below will start at the relevant section.

13. What is the performance measurement/evaluation plan? What is the plan for collecting, analyzing and disseminating performance management and evaluation information?

  • What is the plan for collecting, analyzing and disseminating performance management and evaluation information?

    • Write the performance measurement and evaluation plan on its own Documentation page inside the board.

    • Add a How page with boxes for the measurement or evaluation projects, and attach the measures and evaluation questions they cover.

    • Clone board elements, such as measures and questions, into the plan. When the source is edited, the clone updates too.

    Strategy, measurement, evaluation and contracting can sit in one board, fully aligned and easy to keep current, instead of in separate documents.

    Walkthrough where this is illustrated

The video below will start at the relevant section.

14. How are parties coordinating?
How are the different parties coordinating, sharing information, and resolving conflicts?

How are the different parties coordinating, sharing information, and resolving conflicts?

  • Map organizations, teams or individuals onto the outcomes and steps they are focusing on with vertical links.

  • Use the alignment view, as in question 8, to spot gaps and overlaps in who is doing what.

  • Use this picture to help the parties agree how they will coordinate.

When everyone can see who is working on what, gaps and double-ups are easy to find and resolve.

Walkthrough where this is illustrated

The video below will start at the relevant section.

15. How is progress on measures (e.g., indicators, KPIs, OKRs) being shown?
How is information on metrics, indicators, milestones, targets etc. being shown to measure progress?

The video below will start at the relevant section.

16. How are answers to evaluation questions being shown?
What evaluation questions are being answered, and how are implementation and impact evaluation results being shown?

The video below will start at the relevant section.

17. How is delivery being improved?
How is ongoing implementation of the work being improved as it progresses?

The video below will start at the relevant section.

18. How are results being reported?
How is what is being done, its results and impacts being comprehensively reported back to relevant parties?

The video below will start at the relevant section.

19. How is knowledge management being handled?
How is knowledge and information about the initiative being handed on to others if staff or those delivering the work change?

The video below will start at the relevant section.

20. How is the work being sustained?
How is the work being sustained, scaled, embedded, handed over to others or ultimately exited?

  • How is the work being sustained, scaled, embedded, handed over to others, or ultimately exited?

    • Use the board as the single source of truth, and the system of record, for the work over time.

    • Use it as the authoritative source for AI to produce whatever documentation governance, management, funders or stakeholders require.

    • Over time, offer those you report to a read-only board as the centrepiece of your reporting.

    • Build This-Then pages and develop How page projects that are specifically focused on sustainability of the organization or initiative.

    Today the answers to these 20 questions are usually scattered across many documents. The aim of DoView Planning is that every initiative has one board that answers them, and that carries the work as it is sustained, scaled, handed over or exited.

    Walkthrough where this is illustrated

The video below will start at the relevant section.